Tuesday, December 11, 2007

From Dependance Back Into Bondage

The Governor of South Carolina (Gov. Mark Sanford) was at our school for National Young Reader's Day. While there he had the opportunity to talk to the students. He talked to the Elementary separately from the High School.

I won't get into everything he said, but I did want to mention a quote that he used from an 18th Century Scottish born British lawyer named Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee. Here is the Quote:
A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship.
The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence:
From Bondage to spiritual faith;
From spiritual faith to great courage;
From courage to liberty;
From liberty to abundance;
From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy;
From apathy to dependence;
From dependence back into bondage.
I guess that the quote has been used recently in a notable way. I had never heard it before. The Governor's point was to ask the question, "Where do we fit in?" Obviously we are near the end, so our responsibility as citizens is to extend that life as long as possible.

I am not going to elaborate on the quote, but I did want to pass it on. I thought it was a great quote, and worth passing along.

1 comment:

  1. It is indeed an interesting quote, one that could be applied on a personal spiritual level.....I see this model mirrored to some extent in my own life.
    Anyway , I digress;
    In Australia we've just had an election & voted ourselves a new Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd.
    During the lead up to the election a TV program asked a group of religious leaders from various denominations & faiths what they thought was important, in light of their beliefs, when voting.
    The overwhelming consensus was to choose a Party/leader that would best represent the poor, the young, the elderly, , those in prisons etc....the least's
    Environmentely & globally will they add to the problem or reduce the problem.
    Would they have a spirit of tolerance towards minorites & refugees etc.
    They felt that whether Christian, Muslim , Buddist or whatever,a positive answer to those concerns should come before worrying about fiscal policies.
    One bloke called it the 'Good Samaritan approach.
    I took it as good advice.

    JONO


    Fiscal concerns should only figure

    ReplyDelete

Leave a thought of your own.